This is my first official blog POEM
And it will be treated as my sanctum
All blogs will be post scripted at bottom
and links will be there in right column
What I welcome is opinion news or dictum
But surely this isnt for any damn income
None of the article, will be very random
I assure they are all my wisdom
You are welcome to coment on any item
But that should not be any plagiarism
If there is anything wrong in this rythm
Pardon me as it is my first poem
Autentication is my only symptom
That is why my blog is AWESOME
P.S.
Poet is not what I have become
The above thing is just my mood's outcome :)
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Reviewing Angels and Demons : Dan Brown
As always expected from Dan Brown, the novel has thrill, surprises and a rare combination of scientific facts sandwiched in a nicely depicted fiction that is featured by the most basic characteristic of the author, easy-to-read.
The number of those who liked The Da Vinci Code and do not like Angels and Demons would be very less as the theme, the way of depicting plots, how the surprises are disclosed and role of main characters are very parallel in both the books.
The book introduces readers with CERN, the largest scientific research laboratory, their way and projects they are working upon. One of the senior scientists of CERN, Leonardo Vetra, was murdered his work was stolen. But the most serious part of his murder was the way he was murder i.e. the Illuminati way. Illuminati is the chauvinist group of scientist with science as their religion and religion(church) their enemy. This serious part made the director of CERN call Robert Langdon, professor of religious iconology and art history at Harvard University, the TOM HANKS of the story.
An initial part of investigation with the help of Victoria Vetra, daughter of Leonard, concluded that the work that was stolen was few grams of anti-matter, enough to eliminate Vatican City from the face of our planet. This conclusion, without any doubt, forced Robert and Victoria to fly to Rome, the nearest country to hit the chances of eliminating the elimination of Vatican City. But the fact that anti-matter after 24 hours would blast the country into a desert sliced the chances into very less chance.
Moreover, one of the biggest events of church of electing a new pope was being held in the Vatican City. This made the situation worse for Robert and Victoria to find anti-matter. Also, the killer in a conversation with Robert and Camerlengo, told them that he isn’t just going to hide with anti-matter but kill each of the 4 Prefertitis, one every hour to gain the media attention and hence making sure that elimination of Vatican City does not go unnoticed. Camerlengo was in-charge of church till new pope is elected. Also, he was the only one from church who knew what about the situation and anti-matter.
Robert knew how the Illuminatis worked and thus tried to solve every puzzle of Illuminatis which might make him reach the place where the next Prefertiti is going to be murdered. He got all he support from camerlengo as he had to access many restricted places in Vatican City to find the puzzles. He was smart enough to solve all the puzzles within next four hours but his luck always made him reach few minutes late at the probable place. Thus, Robert could not save the life of any Prefertiti.
Thirty minutes were left for the blast when camerlengo announced that he had conversation with god and he was told about the place where anti-matter was left. And this time the fortune was with Vatican City, and they finally got the anti-matter. Camerlengo then risking his life took the anti-matter in helicopter flew as high as he can and saved Vatican City and also passed the stunt he made by jumping off the helicopter and saving himself.
It was then the story took a turn when Robert saw the CD once given to him bythe director of CERN while he was dying, which disclosed the killer was being commanded by Camerlengo himself just for taking his personal revenges against Illuminatis and old pope who was not there anymore.
Dan Brown has kept isolated dots everywhere in his novel and then connected it at different places, which at last gave a very nice picture to the novel.
The number of those who liked The Da Vinci Code and do not like Angels and Demons would be very less as the theme, the way of depicting plots, how the surprises are disclosed and role of main characters are very parallel in both the books.
The book introduces readers with CERN, the largest scientific research laboratory, their way and projects they are working upon. One of the senior scientists of CERN, Leonardo Vetra, was murdered his work was stolen. But the most serious part of his murder was the way he was murder i.e. the Illuminati way. Illuminati is the chauvinist group of scientist with science as their religion and religion(church) their enemy. This serious part made the director of CERN call Robert Langdon, professor of religious iconology and art history at Harvard University, the TOM HANKS of the story.
An initial part of investigation with the help of Victoria Vetra, daughter of Leonard, concluded that the work that was stolen was few grams of anti-matter, enough to eliminate Vatican City from the face of our planet. This conclusion, without any doubt, forced Robert and Victoria to fly to Rome, the nearest country to hit the chances of eliminating the elimination of Vatican City. But the fact that anti-matter after 24 hours would blast the country into a desert sliced the chances into very less chance.
Moreover, one of the biggest events of church of electing a new pope was being held in the Vatican City. This made the situation worse for Robert and Victoria to find anti-matter. Also, the killer in a conversation with Robert and Camerlengo, told them that he isn’t just going to hide with anti-matter but kill each of the 4 Prefertitis, one every hour to gain the media attention and hence making sure that elimination of Vatican City does not go unnoticed. Camerlengo was in-charge of church till new pope is elected. Also, he was the only one from church who knew what about the situation and anti-matter.
Robert knew how the Illuminatis worked and thus tried to solve every puzzle of Illuminatis which might make him reach the place where the next Prefertiti is going to be murdered. He got all he support from camerlengo as he had to access many restricted places in Vatican City to find the puzzles. He was smart enough to solve all the puzzles within next four hours but his luck always made him reach few minutes late at the probable place. Thus, Robert could not save the life of any Prefertiti.
Thirty minutes were left for the blast when camerlengo announced that he had conversation with god and he was told about the place where anti-matter was left. And this time the fortune was with Vatican City, and they finally got the anti-matter. Camerlengo then risking his life took the anti-matter in helicopter flew as high as he can and saved Vatican City and also passed the stunt he made by jumping off the helicopter and saving himself.
It was then the story took a turn when Robert saw the CD once given to him bythe director of CERN while he was dying, which disclosed the killer was being commanded by Camerlengo himself just for taking his personal revenges against Illuminatis and old pope who was not there anymore.
Dan Brown has kept isolated dots everywhere in his novel and then connected it at different places, which at last gave a very nice picture to the novel.
Friday, April 2, 2010
A Challenging aptitude que............
One of the following is my secret word : AIM DUE MOD OAT TIE. With the list in front of you, if I were to tell you one of my secret word, then you would be able to tell me the number of vowels in my secret word. Which is my secret word?
Ans : Tie
Question : Justify the above answer
Ans : Tie
Question : Justify the above answer
Thursday, April 1, 2010
How do you can keep the windows update up-to-date???
There have been some questions raised about how we service the Windows Update components and concerns expressed about software installing silently. I want to clarify the issue so that everyone can better understand why the self-updating of Windows Update acts the way it does.
So first some background: Windows Update is designed to help our consumer and small business customers (customers without an IT staff) keep their systems up-to-date. To do this, Windows Update provides different updating options: 1) Install updates automatically, 2) Download updates but let me choose whether to install them, 3) Check for updates but let me choose whether to download and install them, and 4) Never check for updates. Our goal is to automate the process wherever possible so that we can increase the likelihood of a system being secure and up-to-date, while giving customers the flexibility to control how and whether updates are installed. The reasons for this are both philosophical and practical. Philosophically, Microsoft believes that users should remain in control of their computer experience. Practically, customers have told us that they want to have time to evaluate our updates before they install them. That said, and to the benefit of both customers and the IT ecosystem, most customers choose to automate the updating experience.
So what is happening here? Windows Update is a service that primarily delivers updates to Windows. To ensure on-going service reliability and operation, we must also update and enhance the Windows Update service itself, including its client side software. These upgrades are important if we are to maintain the quality of the service.
Of course, for enterprise customers who use Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) or Systems Management Server (SMS), all updating (including the WU client) is controlled by the network administrator, who has authority over the download and install experience.
One question we have been asked is why do we update the client code for Windows Update automatically if the customer did not opt into automatically installing updates without further notice? The answer is simple: any user who chooses to use Windows Update either expected updates to be installed or to at least be notified that updates were available. Had we failed to update the service automatically, users would not have been able to successfully check for updates and, in turn, users would not have had updates installed automatically or received expected notifications. That result would not only fail to meet customer expectations but even worse, that result would lead users to believe that they were secure even though there was no installation and/or notification of upgrades. To avoid creating such a false impression, the Windows Update client is configured to automatically check for updates anytime a system uses the WU service, independent of the selected settings for handling updates (for example, “check for updates but let me choose whether to download or install them”). This has been the case since we introduced the automatic update feature in Windows XP. In fact, WU has auto-updated itself many times in the past.
The point of this explanation is not to suggest that we were as transparent as we could have been; to the contrary, people have told us that we should have been clearer on how Windows Update behaves when it updates itself. This is helpful and important feedback, and we are now looking at the best way to clarify WU’s behavior to customers so that they can more clearly understand how WU works. At the same time, however, we wanted to explain the rationale for the product’s behavior so our customers know what the service is doing: WU updates itself to make sure it continues to work properly. We are also confident that the choice to use Automatic Updating continues to be the right choice.
Before closing, I would like to address another misconception that I have seen publically reported. WU does not automatically update itself when Automatic Updates is turned off, this only happens when the customer is using WU to automatically install upgrades or to be notified of updates.
Providing and maintaining the WU service is important to enable us to service our customers and help them maintain safe, more secure and reliable computers. We take this responsibility very seriously and we are proud of the impact that Windows Update has had to help users with safety security and reliability over the years. Updating the client has been and remains a critical piece to this approach.
So first some background: Windows Update is designed to help our consumer and small business customers (customers without an IT staff) keep their systems up-to-date. To do this, Windows Update provides different updating options: 1) Install updates automatically, 2) Download updates but let me choose whether to install them, 3) Check for updates but let me choose whether to download and install them, and 4) Never check for updates. Our goal is to automate the process wherever possible so that we can increase the likelihood of a system being secure and up-to-date, while giving customers the flexibility to control how and whether updates are installed. The reasons for this are both philosophical and practical. Philosophically, Microsoft believes that users should remain in control of their computer experience. Practically, customers have told us that they want to have time to evaluate our updates before they install them. That said, and to the benefit of both customers and the IT ecosystem, most customers choose to automate the updating experience.
So what is happening here? Windows Update is a service that primarily delivers updates to Windows. To ensure on-going service reliability and operation, we must also update and enhance the Windows Update service itself, including its client side software. These upgrades are important if we are to maintain the quality of the service.
Of course, for enterprise customers who use Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) or Systems Management Server (SMS), all updating (including the WU client) is controlled by the network administrator, who has authority over the download and install experience.
One question we have been asked is why do we update the client code for Windows Update automatically if the customer did not opt into automatically installing updates without further notice? The answer is simple: any user who chooses to use Windows Update either expected updates to be installed or to at least be notified that updates were available. Had we failed to update the service automatically, users would not have been able to successfully check for updates and, in turn, users would not have had updates installed automatically or received expected notifications. That result would not only fail to meet customer expectations but even worse, that result would lead users to believe that they were secure even though there was no installation and/or notification of upgrades. To avoid creating such a false impression, the Windows Update client is configured to automatically check for updates anytime a system uses the WU service, independent of the selected settings for handling updates (for example, “check for updates but let me choose whether to download or install them”). This has been the case since we introduced the automatic update feature in Windows XP. In fact, WU has auto-updated itself many times in the past.
The point of this explanation is not to suggest that we were as transparent as we could have been; to the contrary, people have told us that we should have been clearer on how Windows Update behaves when it updates itself. This is helpful and important feedback, and we are now looking at the best way to clarify WU’s behavior to customers so that they can more clearly understand how WU works. At the same time, however, we wanted to explain the rationale for the product’s behavior so our customers know what the service is doing: WU updates itself to make sure it continues to work properly. We are also confident that the choice to use Automatic Updating continues to be the right choice.
Before closing, I would like to address another misconception that I have seen publically reported. WU does not automatically update itself when Automatic Updates is turned off, this only happens when the customer is using WU to automatically install upgrades or to be notified of updates.
Providing and maintaining the WU service is important to enable us to service our customers and help them maintain safe, more secure and reliable computers. We take this responsibility very seriously and we are proud of the impact that Windows Update has had to help users with safety security and reliability over the years. Updating the client has been and remains a critical piece to this approach.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
How does Windows update can be kept itself up-tp-date?
There have been some questions raised about how we service the Windows Update components and concerns expressed about software installing silently. I want to clarify the issue so that everyone can better understand why the self-updating of Windows Update acts the way it does.
So first some background: Windows Update is designed to help our consumer and small business customers (customers without an IT staff) keep their systems up-to-date. To do this, Windows Update provides different updating options: 1) Install updates automatically, 2) Download updates but let me choose whether to install them, 3) Check for updates but let me choose whether to download and install them, and 4) Never check for updates. Our goal is to automate the process wherever possible so that we can increase the likelihood of a system being secure and up-to-date, while giving customers the flexibility to control how and whether updates are installed. The reasons for this are both philosophical and practical. Philosophically, Microsoft believes that users should remain in control of their computer experience. Practically, customers have told us that they want to have time to evaluate our updates before they install them. That said, and to the benefit of both customers and the IT ecosystem, most customers choose to automate the updating experience.
So what is happening here? Windows Update is a service that primarily delivers updates to Windows. To ensure on-going service reliability and operation, we must also update and enhance the Windows Update service itself, including its client side software. These upgrades are important if we are to maintain the quality of the service.
Of course, for enterprise customers who use Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) or Systems Management Server (SMS), all updating (including the WU client) is controlled by the network administrator, who has authority over the download and install experience.
One question we have been asked is why do we update the client code for Windows Update automatically if the customer did not opt into automatically installing updates without further notice? The answer is simple: any user who chooses to use Windows Update either expected updates to be installed or to at least be notified that updates were available. Had we failed to update the service automatically, users would not have been able to successfully check for updates and, in turn, users would not have had updates installed automatically or received expected notifications. That result would not only fail to meet customer expectations but even worse, that result would lead users to believe that they were secure even though there was no installation and/or notification of upgrades. To avoid creating such a false impression, the Windows Update client is configured to automatically check for updates anytime a system uses the WU service, independent of the selected settings for handling updates (for example, “check for updates but let me choose whether to download or install them”). This has been the case since we introduced the automatic update feature in Windows XP. In fact, WU has auto-updated itself many times in the past.
The point of this explanation is not to suggest that we were as transparent as we could have been; to the contrary, people have told us that we should have been clearer on how Windows Update behaves when it updates itself. This is helpful and important feedback, and we are now looking at the best way to clarify WU’s behavior to customers so that they can more clearly understand how WU works. At the same time, however, we wanted to explain the rationale for the product’s behavior so our customers know what the service is doing: WU updates itself to make sure it continues to work properly. We are also confident that the choice to use Automatic Updating continues to be the right choice.
Before closing, I would like to address another misconception that I have seen publically reported. WU does not automatically update itself when Automatic Updates is turned off, this only happens when the customer is using WU to automatically install upgrades or to be notified of updates.
Providing and maintaining the WU service is important to enable us to service our customers and help them maintain safe, more secure and reliable computers. We take this responsibility very seriously and we are proud of the impact that Windows Update has had to help users with safety security and reliability over the years. Updating the client has been and remains a critical piece to this approach.
So first some background: Windows Update is designed to help our consumer and small business customers (customers without an IT staff) keep their systems up-to-date. To do this, Windows Update provides different updating options: 1) Install updates automatically, 2) Download updates but let me choose whether to install them, 3) Check for updates but let me choose whether to download and install them, and 4) Never check for updates. Our goal is to automate the process wherever possible so that we can increase the likelihood of a system being secure and up-to-date, while giving customers the flexibility to control how and whether updates are installed. The reasons for this are both philosophical and practical. Philosophically, Microsoft believes that users should remain in control of their computer experience. Practically, customers have told us that they want to have time to evaluate our updates before they install them. That said, and to the benefit of both customers and the IT ecosystem, most customers choose to automate the updating experience.
So what is happening here? Windows Update is a service that primarily delivers updates to Windows. To ensure on-going service reliability and operation, we must also update and enhance the Windows Update service itself, including its client side software. These upgrades are important if we are to maintain the quality of the service.
Of course, for enterprise customers who use Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) or Systems Management Server (SMS), all updating (including the WU client) is controlled by the network administrator, who has authority over the download and install experience.
One question we have been asked is why do we update the client code for Windows Update automatically if the customer did not opt into automatically installing updates without further notice? The answer is simple: any user who chooses to use Windows Update either expected updates to be installed or to at least be notified that updates were available. Had we failed to update the service automatically, users would not have been able to successfully check for updates and, in turn, users would not have had updates installed automatically or received expected notifications. That result would not only fail to meet customer expectations but even worse, that result would lead users to believe that they were secure even though there was no installation and/or notification of upgrades. To avoid creating such a false impression, the Windows Update client is configured to automatically check for updates anytime a system uses the WU service, independent of the selected settings for handling updates (for example, “check for updates but let me choose whether to download or install them”). This has been the case since we introduced the automatic update feature in Windows XP. In fact, WU has auto-updated itself many times in the past.
The point of this explanation is not to suggest that we were as transparent as we could have been; to the contrary, people have told us that we should have been clearer on how Windows Update behaves when it updates itself. This is helpful and important feedback, and we are now looking at the best way to clarify WU’s behavior to customers so that they can more clearly understand how WU works. At the same time, however, we wanted to explain the rationale for the product’s behavior so our customers know what the service is doing: WU updates itself to make sure it continues to work properly. We are also confident that the choice to use Automatic Updating continues to be the right choice.
Before closing, I would like to address another misconception that I have seen publically reported. WU does not automatically update itself when Automatic Updates is turned off, this only happens when the customer is using WU to automatically install upgrades or to be notified of updates.
Providing and maintaining the WU service is important to enable us to service our customers and help them maintain safe, more secure and reliable computers. We take this responsibility very seriously and we are proud of the impact that Windows Update has had to help users with safety security and reliability over the years. Updating the client has been and remains a critical piece to this approach.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)